Americans have to choose their
priorities, security or civil liberties. President Obama thinks we
have struck the proper balance. I would disagree, as do most people
at the moment, judging from the current brouhaha about the collection
of domestic phone data.
As the NYT stresses in an editorial yesterday that calls for a drastic scaling back or outright
elimination of the Patriot Act, any executive branch is going to push
the limits, if not outright overreach the limits, of its authority.
The particular outrage President Obama, a constitutional scholar, is
committing is that he is continuing the Bush-Cheney policies, after
campaigning against them. And, one might say, knowing better.
But on the other hand, is it any wonder
this is the case? For example, I have no doubt that many of the same
people who were hyper-critical of the FBI and the Justice Department
for having let the elder of the Boston bombers slip through their
fingers are now incensed at the collection of phone data. And they no
doubt don't see any hypocrisy, or even irony in that. If we are
going to react with partisan outrage to every breakdown in national
security, then we can expect executives to continue using these
tools, if only to cover their asses.
Just as Obama recently asked Congress
to refine or totally take back the blank check it gave to the office
of the President in the Authorization for the Use of Military Force,
he should also ask for a re-examination or retraction of the Patriot
Act.
Nobody who supported the Patriot Act or
its partial re-authorization has much right to complain about how it
is working out in practice.
No comments:
Post a Comment