Bob Peterson, in a comment on my
previous post, wonders what real patriotism looks like, as opposed to
what I called patriotism on the cheap.
Merriam Webster defines patriotism as
simply “love for or devotion to one's country.” It is not love
for or devotion to the military system of one's country. But that is
what it seems to have become in the U.S. For most people nowadays,
patriotism means support for the military and, conversely, any form
of opposition to the country's militaristic stance in the world is
deemed unpatriotic. Admit it: you hear the word patriot or patriotism and you think about the military.
It is good to remember that people in nation states all
around the world are patriotic, which is to say
they love and are devoted to their respective countries. Brazilians,
for example, seem to me frequently to be annoyingly patriotic,
excessive in their national pride. But that pride and the way it
manifests itself has nothing at all to do with the strength of their
military.
Soccer is every bit as much the
national sport in countries all over the world as baseball is in the
U.S. But I don't recall ever seeing ostentatious displays of military
personnel or equipment as part of the ceremonies surrounding big
games...certainly no fly overs, and not even military personnel marching on
field with flags. And we watch a lot of soccer in our house,
including championship games from all over the world.
So back to the question of what real
patriotism might look like. It might look like a Peace Corp or Vista
volunteer. It might look like a college grad devoting the first year
or two out of school teaching in the inner city. It might take the
form of working to realize the potential of diversity in the U.S. by
celebrating the building of community as much as rugged individuality. It might mean
agitating to end the nightmarish situation faced my tens of thousands
of veterans who are waiting for over a year just to have their
benefit claims processed.
In the past, patriotic feelings of pride might have been inspired by the promise of social mobility in the U.S.,
by the unequaled system of public education, or by the economic strength of the middle class. None of these are legitimate sources of pride anymore except when we lower our standards and compare ourselves to...say... Albania.
As we become ever smaller, meaner, more petty and selfish maybe all that's left is the military.
3 comments:
Thanks, Gerry. Good points.
One of your points indicated that new grads should have some public service. I heartily endorse that, and believe that our idea of patriotism, of what we owe and what is owed to us would be different if everyone were expected to serve in some way.
Also agree that there is a lot more respect for the military now than in the anti-military days of Viet Nam. Also, more respect for the police as well?
Never going to eliminate the "patriotism on the cheap," though, just as you can't control Mets fans booing at the All-Star Game. There are just some folks...
I honestly tried to determine if I believe patriotism/patriot means the military, and it just doesn't to me. When I think of patriotism, it includes the military, but encompasses so much more.
You have now mentioned the plight of the veterans who are not being served regarding their benefits. That is horrible. Can you steer me to a resource on that? Thanks.
Bob, just google "veteran benefits delay" or something along those lines and you can stay busy reading all day long.
I would argue that patriotism on the cheap is not the equivalent of Met fans booing at an All Star game. It is more the equivalent of the Mets management encouraging their fans to boo at an All Star game.
It is not an example of "some people! Whaddaya gonna do?"
Rather, it serves the purpose of certain interests and is encouraged. It is an example of people being used and manipulated.
Post a Comment