The basic concepts behind this model are:
Complementarity. In much the same way that light is both a particle and a wave, Mitt Romney is both a moderate and a conservative, depending on the situation (Fig. 1). It is not that he is one or the other; it is not that he is one and then the other. He is both at the same time.
Probability. Mitt Romney’s political viewpoints can be expressed only in terms of likelihood, not certainty. While some views are obviously far less likely than others, no view
can be thought of as absolutely impossible. Thus, for instance, there
is at any given moment a nonzero chance that Mitt Romney supports child
slavery.
Uncertainty. Frustrating as it may be, the rules of quantum campaigning dictate that no human being can ever simultaneously know both what Mitt Romney’s current position is and where that position will be at some future date. This is known as the “principle uncertainty principle.”
Entanglement. It doesn’t matter whether it’s a proton, neutron
or Mormon: the act of observing cannot be separated from the outcome of
the observation. By asking Mitt Romney how he feels about an issue, you
unavoidably affect how he feels about it. More precisely, Mitt Romney
will feel every possible way about an issue until the moment he
is asked about it, at which point the many feelings decohere into the
single answer most likely to please the asker.
Noncausality. The Romney campaign often violates, and even reverses, the law of cause and effect. For example, ordinarily the cause of getting the most votes leads to the effect of being considered the most electable candidate. But in the case of Mitt Romney, the cause of being considered the most electable candidate actually produces the effect of getting the most votes.
Duality. Many conservatives believe the existence of Mitt
Romney allows for the possibility of the spontaneous creation of an
“anti-Romney” (Fig. 2) that leaps into existence and annihilates Mitt
Romney. (However, the science behind this is somewhat suspect, as it is
financed by Rick Santorum, for whom science itself is suspect.)
No comments:
Post a Comment